God’s Plans for the Now
In the trilogy of films ‘Back To The Future’, time travel enables a character to obtain a sports almanac from the future and make bets with certainty on the results of matches. This demonstrates a very human tendency to want to make plans for the future and be in control of what happens in the future, even though this is actually not possible!

From a young age when we’re urged to study hard to look after and plan for our futures, we tend to enjoy planning ahead and so when we read in the Bible that God has good plans for us (Jer 29:11), our tendency is to want God to reveal those plans to us instantaneously. We can be so concerned about the future plans God has for us that we fail to live in the now or understand that His plans also encompass the now. We can become impatient and not understand that God has times and seasons for us all and waiting for Him to reveal His plans is part of the journey of faith.
Jesus reminded us that the birds of the air do not sow or reap or store away in barns; they make no plans for tomorrow and yet are provided for by the Lord. (Matt 6:25-27) In the same way, we need to understand that God looks after us on an everyday basis and is wanting to work out His purposes in the now. Don’t be so concerned about future plans that you fail to appreciate God’s love, care, provision and guidance in the now.
God’s New Thing
God is often doing new things, as Isaiah reminds us (Is 42:9, Is 43:19), something which we generally find rather frightening. Many of us are creatures of habit and we like the familiarity and comfort of routines. It’s this tendency to find change uncomfortable and threatening which explains much of the opposition to the gospel we find in the Bible and in our society today.
Stephen faced opposition because he was accused of speaking blasphemous words against Moses (revered by Jews as the law-giver) and God (Acts 6:11), of speaking against the holy place (the temple) and the law (Acts 6:13). The charges brought against him were false, but it is clear that, through his preaching, he was forcing people to re-think their traditional views on these subjects, something they found infuriating and were unwilling to heed. Jesus Himself had been arrested and tried for these same things (see Mark 14:57-59, Matt 26:60-61) and He had certainly talked in radical terms about the temple (John 2:19-22) and about the law (Matt 5:17-48). Religious leaders had failed to understand what He meant by these things, and this same lack of understanding was present with Stephen.
Jesus taught that the temple and the law would be superseded, meaning not that they had never been divine gifts in the first place, but that they would find their God-intended fulfilment in him, the Messiah. Jesus was and is himself the replacement of the temple and the fulfilment of the law. Both the temple and the law pointed forward to Jesus and are now fulfilled in him, as the book of Hebrews make explicit. (Heb 10:1) It was this resistance to the ‘new thing’ God was doing in Jesus which led to both Jesus’s crucifixion and Stephen’s death by stoning.
We need to be careful not to be just as stiff-necked and resistant to the changes God’s Holy Spirit wants to bring into our lives and into our churches. God’s ‘new thing’ will always stretch our faith, our understanding and our willingness to change, but we must be open to what He is saying and willing to bend with the wind of the Spirit. As Garry’s children’s song puts it, ‘are you a wall or a windmill?’ We need to allow the Holy Spirit to work in us and through us and not be like those who opposed Stephen’s challenging ministry.
Dealing With Opposition
Opposition has become a familiar theme in our Bible studies in Acts; this was something the early church had to contend with from the outset, and this is not surprising, given the opposition that Jesus Himself had to face. Jesus warned His disciples frequently about this (e.g. Matt 10:16-20, Matt 24:9-14, Luke 21:12-19) and gave strategies for dealing with opposition which, as Garry recently reminded us, can only be fulfilled as we live in the Spirit (Matt 5:11-12, Matt 5:38-48, Rom 12:17-21), so revolutionary are they!
Stephen faced opposition to his preaching. Initially, his opponents tried to debate with him (as they had with Jesus – see Matt 21:23ff), but when they failed, they resorted to false charges (Acts 6:11, 13; see also Matt 26:59) and personal slander. This is often the way the enemy works; as Tom Wright wryly comments, “People today often find real debate about actual topics difficult, and much prefer the parody of debate which consists of giving a dog a bad name and then beating him for it, and lashing out too at anyone who happens to associates with the dog you happen to be beating at the time.” (Tom Wright, ‘Acts For Everyone Pt 1’, P 103)
Paul tells us that ‘everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted’ (2 Tim 3:12), a verse we would prefer to ignore. Stephen was the first Christian martyr, but he shows us how to bear opposition with grace and poise. We are told ‘they could not stand up against the wisdom the Spirit gave him as he spoke’ (Acts 6:10), and all through this account, we see the grace of Christ shining through him: his face like an angel (Acts 6:15), his courage when being stoned (Acts 7:55-56) and his ability to forgive others even as they were killing him. (Acts 7:59-60) Stephen, this man of the Spirit, full of faith, wisdom and grace, gives us a living example of how to deal with opposition. We may wonder why God allowed this man to die, why his ministry was cut short, why suffering has to be such an integral part of life, but in living out his faith to the end, Stephen fills us with hope and shows us that God’s plans cannot be thwarted, even by death.

Misguided zeal
God wants us to be zealous for Him; Paul urges us never to be lacking in zeal, but always to keep our spiritual fervour, serving the Lord (Rom 12:11). Zeal is that fire and passion which keeps us serving, keeps us persevering and refuses to let us give up, however discouraged we may be at times. Nonetheless, it is a stark, sobering fact of life that zeal can be misguided. Paul himself knew that, for there was none more zealous than he as a Pharisee in persecuting the church: ‘If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; 6 as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless.’ (Phil 3:4-6)
Much of the opposition faced by the apostles and early Christians could be said to come from misguided zeal, from religious tranches in Judaism who cared passionately about the law and the temple. Stephen aroused such condemnation because he was said to ‘speak blasphemous words against Moses and against God’ (Acts 6:11); ‘This fellow never stops speaking against this holy place and against the law.’(Acts 6:13) It is a frightening fact that the religious leaders could not cope with the radical teaching of Jesus and His followers and genuinely believed they were doing God’s will in opposing them.
Jesus had been arrested and tried on much the same grounds as those now being used to question Stephen; He had challenged traditional scribal interpretations of the Law, saying that He had come not to abolish the law but to fulfil it (Matt 5:17), and had prophesied not only the destruction of the temple but that He would raise it again in three days. (John 2:19-22; see also Mark 14:57-59.) John makes it clear that the temple Jesus was talking about was the temple of His body; Paul would later go on to remind believers that our bodies are now the temple of the Holy Spirit. (1 Cor 6:19) The law and the Temple all pointed ahead to the radical work Jesus would complete on our behalf; the book of Hebrews makes it very plain that Jesus is the fulfilment of all the sacrificial system that preceded Him and that ‘the law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves.’ (Heb 10:1)
Stephen was the victim of misguided zeal, stoned to death as the first Christian martyr because of his bold proclamation of Christ’s teaching about both the law and the Temple. It’s ironic that those sitting in the Sanhedrin looked intently at him and saw his face shining like an angel (Acts 6:15), just as Moses’s face shone after his encounter with God when he was given the law (Ex 34:29-35). They did not heed the Light which had come into the world and they did not heed the light shining from one of His followers. Misguided zeal is a dangerous thing indeed.

What’s Your Legacy?
I was once given a book of funny epitaphs found on tombstones, ranging from ‘I told you I was ill’ to ‘we finally found a place to park in Georgetown!’ People often like to leave witty comments as their final legacy and sometimes poems have been engraved on tombstones, such as:
Owen Moore
Gone away
Owin’ more
Than he could pay.
Or
Here lies the body
of Jonathan Blake
Stepped on the gas
Instead of the brake.
Whilst we may find these things funny, the legacy we leave behind is more than a humorous epitaph on a tombstone (or even a sentimental one), more than the money or property we may bequeath to family members (or animal charities.) It matters how we are remembered, not simply so that we can be famous or entered into some archive or other, but because we are made in God’s image and therefore the influence we have on people and our world can echo long after our mortal remains have perished. Since God has set eternity in our hearts (Eccl 3:11), it matters that what we do and are lasts into eternity.
Stephen is a character in the Bible who features in just three chapters in the book of Acts, but his influence was profound. He is introduced to us as being one of the seven men chosen to oversee the distribution of food to the widows (Acts 6:5) and is described as being a man ‘full of the Spirit and wisdom’ (Acts 6:3), ‘a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit’ (Acts 6:5), and ‘a man full of God’s grace and power’ who performed great signs and wonders among the people (Acts 6:8). His speech to the Sanhedrin (which takes up most of Acts 7) is one of the most succinct and eloquent potted histories of the Israelites in the whole Bible and he will forever be known as the first Christian martyr (Acts 7:54-60). That’s quite a legacy for someone whose life story takes up relatively little space in our understanding of God. It would seem that Stephen’s death had a profound impact on Saul of Tarsus (see Acts 8:1), and so the legacy went far beyond Stephen’s lifetime, reverberating throughout history and reminding us what pure devotion to God can look like.
I wonder if my life had to be summarised in as few words as these descriptions in Acts 6 whether I would be as happy with the description of myself as Stephen surely would have been with Luke’s description of himself. Three times Stephen is described as being ‘full of…’ Wisdom, faith, grace and power are impressive qualities to be remembered for: I think I’d settle for just one of those! Stephen was clearly someone who loved God and walked in his ways. Ultimately, that description would be one I’d be happy to live (and die) with, and it’s no surprise that I chose to name my only son after this remarkable man. Stephen has much to teach us about a faithful (and faith-full) life; his legacy lives on for all to see.

A couple from our church recently visited the Royal Mint in South Wales and told us of how you can lift a gold bar there worth £400,000. A mint is a place where money is made and stored and as such is often seen as the ‘richest’ place in a country. The Royal Mint becomes the representation of a country’s wealth and prosperity.

